RIPv1 vs RIPv2 vs EIGRP vs OSPF

RIPv2
- support classful or classless routing behaviour
- send its updates periodically
- use bellman ford algorithm
- Automatically summarizes at major network boundaries



EIGRP
- support classful or classless routing behaviour
- send its updates only when the metric for a route changes
- use DUAL algorithm
- menggunakan metric bandwidth, delay, load,
- Automatically summarizes at major network boundaries
- process-id itu all significant; artinya semua ruter ospf yang ada di dalam ruting domain diharuskan mempunyai/menggunakan process-id yang sama.
- Di EIGRP wildcard mask itu optional, berbeda dengan OSPF. Note: Like EIGRP, some IOS versions allow you to simply enter the subnet mask instead of the wildcard mask. The IOS then converts the subnet mask to the wildcard mask format.


OSPF
- menggunakan metric bandwidth
- process-id itu local significant; artinya semua ruter ospf yang ada di dalam ruting domain tidak diharuskan mempunyai/menggunakan process-id yang sama. Berbeda dengan EIGRP.
- Di OSPF wildcard mask itu required. Beda dengan EIGRP, optional. Note: Like EIGRP, some IOS versions allow you to simply enter the subnet mask instead of the wildcard mask. The IOS then converts the subnet mask to the wildcard mask format.
- OSPF does not automatically summarize at major network boundaries.